3 ms·
This implies it's rational to fear for your freedom as a law-abiding person on the basis that a true criminal was convicted. That makes no sense. By that logic
by ryanmonroe 8y ago
This implies it's rational to fear for your freedom as a law-abiding person on the basis that a true criminal was convicted. That makes no sense. By that logic we should be against letting police arrest these robbers anyway, because if they did, all of the non-criminal commuters would refuse to enter BART for fear of being charged with robbery.
- twblalock 8y agoNo, it does not imply that.
- ryanmonroe 8y agoThis statement > The BART police are afraid of being falsely accused even when they are in the right, because of the legacy of the Oscar Grant case is not accurately summarized by this statement? > Law-abiding people are afraid of being falsely accused, because of the fact that a true criminal was convicted What part is incorrect?