3 ms·
That was one random school student's comments. Meanwhile, keep reading: "Its recent plan doesn’t include more than $35 million in city fees compared with an a
by masonic 8y ago
That was one random school student's comments.
Meanwhile, keep reading:
"Its recent plan doesn’t include more than $35 million in city fees compared with an alternative project. It doesn’t have a traffic mitigation plan and calls for taller buildings, up to 240 feet, close to the height of San Jose’s tallest towers."
So, no traffic mitigation plan (essentially all traffic being dumped onto Wolfe Road there, with the rest dumped onto Stevens Creek Blvd) and no standard development fees (where are those low-income kids going to go to school?).
and
"Vallco’s SB35 affordable housing plan includes low- and very-low-income units, but not moderate-income units that are typically available for teachers."
Zero moderate-income units and only enough below-moderate income units to qualify for SB35 exemptions.
- protomyth 8y agoI really don't care about the rest. This person got away with saying something as asinine as that. The fact I got down-voted and you defended that comment just makes me a bit sick.
- masonic 8y agoyou defended that comment No, I dismissed it. No one ranting youth sets policy. Fortunately, neither does someone who doesn't care about the critical facts of an issue.
- protomyth 8y agoYou backed up the comment with a bunch of points from the rest of the article. Why bother replying to me with that when my point was about the attitude shown by one person that seems to have gone unchallenged? In the context of my post, I really don't care about the "critical facts" because I was commenting on the attitude of someone testifying. "I dismiss his comment but he's actually right and here is why" isn't really interesting.