> Things we pay $0.99 today for used to cost $50. It's interesting because I imagine that'll be Apple's argument, and the natural counter-argument is that the

> Things we pay $0.99 today for used to cost $50. It's interesting because I imagine that'll be Apple's argument, and the natural counter-argument is that the $0.99 price is deceptive because of the "freemium" model of most apps. Not sure how convincing they can make that argument, but it'll be interesting nonetheless. I imagine it'll involve putting an average "cost-per-app" including in-app purchases.