3 ms·
Most companies require a CLA. A CLA is not automatically equivalent to handing over copyright to the contribution. In some cases, the company is asking for a l
by amenghra 8y ago
Most companies require a CLA. A CLA is not automatically equivalent to handing over copyright to the contribution.
In some cases, the company is asking for a license to use+distribute the code (which IMHO should be implied by open a PR in the first place).
For example, you can read Square’s CLA here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeRVQ35-gq2vdSxD1kdh7CJwRdjmUA0EZ9gRXaWYoUeKPZEQQ/viewform?formkey=dDViT2xzUHAwRkI3X3k5Z0lQM091OGc6MQ&ndplr=1 https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeRVQ35-gq2vdSxD1kd...
- namibj 8y agoGPL skips the issue due to the PR having to be GPL to even be published. AGPL might be an issue though? Would it need to be explicit? Still, GPL.