3 ms·
It could still be argued that the difference is in degree rather than in kind- that the 'extra bandwidth connecting his senses' allowed him to clearly articulat
by analogyexpert 8y ago
It could still be argued that the difference is in degree rather than in kind- that the 'extra bandwidth connecting his senses' allowed him to clearly articulate as sensation a phenomenon much more subconscious in the typical patron's mind.
- keiferski 8y agoNo, not really. If you read the book, you will see that his mind was very idiosyncratic and the associations he made were highly unique and imagination-based, and not some sort of heightened sensory input.