3 ms·
Good points and well laid out. I don't quite get the DVs. One point I'd make, about the "tissue culture that originates from an aborted baby" vaccine. Accordin
by berbec 8y ago
Good points and well laid out. I don't quite get the DVs.
One point I'd make, about the "tissue culture that originates from an aborted baby" vaccine. According to [1], the MMR vaccine:
"The viruses are cultured in aborted fetal tissue cells. The cells were obtained more than 50 years ago, as a result of elective abortions"
There are no new fetal tissues being "harvested" (I know that's not the proper term, forgive me) to make more vaccines. They are keeping cultures donated fifty years ago growing.
I can understand people not liking the hard-sell on vaccines, but what I can't wrap my head around is how much effort should have to go into the argument "give your kids these shots so a horrific number of children don't make it to 15". The CDC has a broad info page, but one point comes across crystal clear to me (even specifically about the MMR vaccine):
"An epidemic of rubella (German measles) in 1964-65 infected 12½ million Americans, killed 2,000 babies, and caused 11,000 miscarriages. Since 2012, 15 cases of rubella were reported to CDC." [2]
1: https://www.verywellhealth.com/do-vaccines-contain-aborted-fetal-tissue-260337 https://www.verywellhealth.com/do-vaccines-contain-aborted-f...
2: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/whatifstop.htm https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/whatifstop.htm