They would try to use their patents offensively if their mission is to make as much money as possible. They would encourage manufacturers to adopt some form of

They would try to use their patents offensively if their mission is to make as much money as possible. They would encourage manufacturers to adopt some form of safety system, even if it wasn't theirs, if their goal was to keep table saw users safe. There is some plausible deniability if the competing systems are not as good as theirs - is something better than nothing, or does it create a false sense of security, etc. - but it is pretty clear that Sawstop values profit over the safety of people who can't afford their system.