3 ms·
However, the problem is that loans are an extrapolation of 30 years of income. So in a boom portion of the cycle, we over project an unsustainable income but in
by zippy5 8y ago
However, the problem is that loans are an extrapolation of 30 years of income. So in a boom portion of the cycle, we over project an unsustainable income but in the bust portion, we under project. There is an inherit recency bias in the loan approval process.
When coupled with an interest rates that are far below the historical median, there is an implication that a buyer can take out more debt than in any other economic conditions.
This is a great resource to understand macroeconomic debt cycles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHe0bXAIuk0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHe0bXAIuk0
However in a place like Toronto, I imagine there could be a lots of regional factor that would be more significant than interest rates:
- Gentrification
- Zoning Restrictions
- Increase in Population
- Geographic constraints (like bridges, freeways, school districts)
Personally, I suspect you'll do quite well in Toronto but every housing market faces headwinds at some point.
- 01100011 8y agoAnd on the flip side, you can assume some level of inflation which makes that 30 year bet on your income less crazy. Sure, I don't expect to make 200k+ in inflation adjusted dollars for 30 years, but I might make that much after inflation devalues the dollar.