I find they do a pretty sound job on topics I know, even when I happen to disagree with them. Gell-Mann applies less frequently there than much of the rest of t

I find they do a pretty sound job on topics I know, even when I happen to disagree with them. Gell-Mann applies less frequently there than much of the rest of the media. "partisan when it suits them" They spell out their worldview, far more plainly and thoroughly than most, and explicitly non-partisan on their about us page. So is their ownership. They're consistent enough that I generally know on what topics we will differ. They've never supported a particular party but come election time and big issues they endorse one way or the other, with reasoning. Beats the single party (whichever party) come what may stance of most titles. What more could you want? Like the FT, I find them far less partisan than younger-me once expected.