"Symmetry" is reflective not rotational. Currency exchange is a map not a graph. "we" is "i". if physics is simpler than economics than using economics as a m

"Symmetry" is reflective not rotational. Currency exchange is a map not a graph. "we" is "i". if physics is simpler than economics than using economics as a metaphor for physics is the exact fucking opposite of useful. There is no cited proof that "An extra dimension is not a necessary assumption, only the symmetry is." The Maxwell equations bare no resemblance to exchange rates. It turns out that the mass of the particle is related to the energy cost to excite a very long wavelength wave. This is related to the famous formula E = mc 2 . Unfortunately I have not found a short way to explain this, so you will have to trust me on this. In our economic analogy we have not talked about energy. Let us simply say that the energy increases as the gain available to speculators increases. This makes intuitive sense, the more the speculators can earn, the harder it is for the banks! Okay I admit this analogy makes no sense but lets keep going...? 3.1 Apologizing for one oversimplification ONE?!