4 ms·

There is obviously in human nature to communicate with others, and share whatever they think is good, while maintaining a certain level of privacy. In real life

by ccozan 8y ago

There is obviously in human nature to communicate with others, and share whatever they think is good, while maintaining a certain level of privacy. In real life, this is already happening and it works. However, this must not be captured by an entity who's sole target is profit, neither a state owned entity. Both will hamper the communication at some point, either by manipulating or censoring information. My only hope is that a benevolent AI will coordinate this, having prime directives not to harm humans ( by the means of interfering with the communication ). EDIT: some typos, and also mentioning that the affirmations from above should be read in the perspective of Facebook disappearing/dying and being replaced by something else.

cyborgx7 8y ago
>However, this must not be captured by an entity who's sole target is profit, neither a state owned entity. >My only hope is that a benevolent AI will coordinate this, having prime directives not to harm humans ( by the means of interfering with the communication ). It would have to be some kind of public infrastructure, if you want to avoid the profit motivation. I don't see how an AI would solve this.
chosenbreed 8y ago
> My only hope is that a benevolent AI will coordinate this, having prime directives not to harm humans ( by the means of interfering with the communication ). Mmm...who's going to write that benevolent AI? :)