3 ms·
> as it is highlighting that companies on both sides are susceptible to more or less the same type of government control. Except they aren't. Just the fact tha
by friedman23 8y ago
> as it is highlighting that companies on both sides are susceptible to more or less the same type of government control.
Except they aren't. Just the fact that you mention "both" sides shows your ignorance. The alternative to Huawei, as I have mentioned, is not an American corporation it is a European one (Ericsson or Nokia). This isn't a case of the American government forcing allies to abandon Huawei so an American corporation can profit.
- kungtotte 8y agoWhat about the rest of the world? Samsung and LG are both Korea-based, and Sony is from Japan.
- friedman23 8y agoI wasn't aware that they had 5g offerings but if they do they are obviously choices too. I'm not aware of any American 5g offerings.
- vetinari 8y agoNokia merged with Alcatel-Lucent, so it is not purely European anymore. Ericsson works on 5G with Fujitsu, so that looks more like US-free option.
- pilsetnieks 8y agoIt is my understanding that Nokia _acquired_ Alcatel-Lucent, and the only significant part of that conglomerate still in the US is Bell Labs (which are also now owned by Nokia.)
- iagovar 8y agoDo euro vendors provide hardware for the whole chain? I mean, from dslams, to routers, olts, cpe etc If wanted to set up an ISP could I without buying non-eu vendors?