2 ms·
Evacuees need to carry their infants, pets, and enough luggage to live for a few days... there’s nowhere near crush-load commute capacity. There is no point to
by closeparen 8y ago
Evacuees need to carry their infants, pets, and enough luggage to live for a few days... there’s nowhere near crush-load commute capacity. There is no point to a little town in the woods if it’s going to be urban enough for transit coverage. It really looks like humans just shouldn’t live in places like this.
- JBReefer 8y agoPeople don't like to hear that, or that they shouldn't live places without natural water sources
- slededit 8y agoTowns obliterated by fires just don't happen often enough that we need to make forests "no-go" areas. Even if one town per year were completely destroyed it wouldn't be sufficient justification because there are many such towns and the probability of a specific one being destroyed is still a once in a century event.