3 ms·
It is common for me to have miscellaneous changes I don’t want to commit, but I think this is problematic on my part, and I shouldn’t typically be doing it. Th
by randallsquared 8y ago
It is common for me to have miscellaneous changes I don’t want to commit, but I think this is problematic on my part, and I shouldn’t typically be doing it. The only defensible version of this I can think of offhand is changes that are necessary to get the repo to work in my local, but which I am not yet able or willing to commit and push.
- saagarjha 8y agoYou can always use the stash for changes like this.
- randallsquared 8y agoIt depends. If you have, as we do at my work, a pre-commit hook that runs acceptance tests on each commit, and if the changes you've made are to get it to work on your local, then leaving those changes in for the test run is really the only option. Should I get those changes committed? I should. But that involves a lot more testing and thought, since it still has to work for other people with different local dev setups.