4 ms·
I run into the same problem, am much better at understanding maths stated as code than in mathematical notation. 3blue1brown's animated maths channel is pretty
by starbeast 8y ago
I run into the same problem, am much better at understanding maths stated as code than in mathematical notation.
3blue1brown's animated maths channel is pretty good. - https://www.3blue1brown.com/ https://www.3blue1brown.com/
Khan Academy's maths section covers a lot of stuff - https://www.khanacademy.org/math https://www.khanacademy.org/math
math.stackexchange is excellent for specific questions -
https://math.stackexchange.com/ https://math.stackexchange.com/
One thing that works for me is to try and find something stated both in code and in maths notation, then you can work out one from the other.
- imjustsaying 8y agoI always wondered why math notation hasn't been replaced by code. While math notations can be interpreted in different ways, code is going to give an unambiguous result. Why don't mathematicians, especially those writing in machine learning or computer science domains, do this? Is it just a problem of agreeing on a common language?
- yesenadam 8y agoYou mean, "Why don't they use a language you understand, instead of one you don't?"... Why expect they should? I don't think math notations can be interpreted in different ways usually is right. That would defeat the purpose of using them, if the meaning wasn't exactly clear. And maths notation is more compact, a lot more. Even assuming a translation between the 2 always is possible or makes sense.
- fooker 8y agoIf math notation was unambiguous, automatic theorem provers would take that as input instead of inventing their own languages.