3 ms·

Great, can we get an article from the Family Research Council next? https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Institute_for_Family_Studies https://www.sourcewatch.

• davesque 8y ago
  I had the same initial reaction when I saw this. But the article appears to be pretty reasonable actually. I didn't catch strong hints of an agenda.
  • ceejayoz 8y ago
    The best sort of agenda-driven study is one that doesn't openly look that way, though. Lots of ways to subtly mislead with cherry-picked stats or the "men don't report reliably anyways, so we can't consider that" hand-waving this article does.
    • thoughtexplorer 8y ago
      > Lots of ways to subtly mislead with cherry-picked stats or the "men don't report reliably anyways, so we can't consider that" hand-waving this article does. Yikes, let's not be misleading in turn. That's not why they don't have those stats. Here's the actual reason and context you conveniently left out: "unfortunately, the NSFG doesn’t have full data on men’s premarital sexual behavior, and in any event they recall their own marital histories less reliably than do women)" Demonstrate why they are incorrect or misleading as opposed to setting up a strawman.