3 ms·
They’d have to report it themselves. This is a worse value proposition than regular blackmail, where you take an existing violation, which the target already kn
by nothrabannosir 8y ago
They’d have to report it themselves. This is a worse value proposition than regular blackmail, where you take an existing violation, which the target already knows is illegal and has already shown willingness to conceal from authorities (or is not illegal at all, but e.g. just embarrassing), and threaten leaking it. In the proposed scheme, the mere reception of the threat itself creates a new situation for the receiver which must be reported. Paying off the blackmailer puts you in a worse spot than before. Not so with “ordinary”, Hollywood movie blackmail.
- usrusr 8y agoNitpick: I don't think that they would have to report themselves if what the attacker claims isn't actually true. They could still fail horribly at verifying the claim (and subsequently pay the appropriate "tax" for that failure)