Weird, you're right. It definitely referenced it when I first read the article. I wonder what the motivation would be for removing that reference. EDIT: Note

Weird, you're right. It definitely referenced it when I first read the article. I wonder what the motivation would be for removing that reference. EDIT: Note that I am not user "runn1ng"; I am corroborating what they referenced about the contents of the article EDIT2: They even mentioned three-or-so specific forums or websites, or something.