I am working on medical devices, where a bug can have catastrophic consequences. Essentially the ecosystem today is C and C++ for embedded FW and middleware. E

I am working on medical devices, where a bug can have catastrophic consequences. Essentially the ecosystem today is C and C++ for embedded FW and middleware. Even if we are careful, we rely on static analysis tools to avoid some categories of bug. (Plus a humongous amount of tests). Typically bugs that would be caught (mostly) by the Rust compiler at compile time. I think it is a great idea to have some safety guarantee at compile time. Would Rust fixes every problem ? Absolutely not, you'll always get logical bug or implementation not conform to the requirements but I think it is a move in the right direction, and I hope that slowly in next 10 years Rust will grow in the embedded space. And overall cargo is nice, C/C++ don't have standard package manager. The test infrastructure is there by default, this is a breeze to add them in your code, rather than relying on an external framework, so this is also good. I don't really see an alternative today for small footprint SW where C and C++ is king, and I hope that embedded toolchain vendors are taking notes. If today you mostly code in javascript or python, unless you need bare metal like performance or to have stronger safety guarantee, maybe it does not make sense to move to Rust.