> However other groups exist which a) present equally-convincing (to the OP) arguments If he thinks those convincing argument exist, he should present or link

> However other groups exist which a) present equally-convincing (to the OP) arguments If he thinks those convincing argument exist, he should present or link to them. It doesn't make sense to link to one side and then say "equally convincing counterarguments exist". > With multiple sets of equally-convincing arguments leading to contradictory outcomes, it is not rational to accept any one set. The proper response to this, if you have given up on assessing the correct conclusion, would be to retain uncertainty, not, as the OP has done, exude confidence that the superintelligence arguments are wrong.