5 ms·
I can speak for all FB advertisers when I say this was a huge pain in the ass.
by cm2012 8y ago
I can speak for all FB advertisers when I say this was a huge pain in the ass.
- craftyguy 8y agoPerhaps, but it sounds like a rare win for actual users of facebook.
- cm2012 8y agoFacebook users, as a whole, like the Facebook ads I run for my clients. They click, share, comment and buy the products or services or advertise, which are all pretty solid. There's almost no where else on the web where my products (SMB services, mostly) can be connected to my customers (business owners) at scale and at a reasonable cost, by the way.
- acct1771 8y agoGot an email address?
- jonathanjaeger 8y agoThe users were still seeing ads once Facebook, as a site, was back up. Just because campaign managers for ads couldn't use the Ads Manager, doesn't mean users don't see ads. For example, I had campaigns spending thousands of dollars, but I just had to guesstimate the cost because Ads Manager wasn't showing the data. That means I could be underspending or overspending because I couldn't optimize. It's a real headache for ad buyers, but once again, users still see ads.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- type0 8y agoI would rather give money to the mob than fb, at least those guys are more honest. I can't understand why anyone still thinks it's a good idea to give money to this monstrosity of a website.
- squish78 8y agothey probably think it's a good idea because they are able to advertise their product/service to potential customers, thereby increasing their revenue