4 ms·
List of studies, and the outcome: 1 Direction & SES (Huang et al., 2014) p<.001 2 Structure and goal-pursuit (Kay et al., 2014) p=0.97 3 Incidental disfluenc
by andrelaszlo 8y ago
List of studies, and the outcome:
1 Direction & SES (Huang et al., 2014) p<.001
2 Structure and goal-pursuit (Kay et al., 2014) p=0.97
3 Incidental disfluency (Alter et al., 2007) p=0.67
4 Moral Foundations (Graham et al., 2009) p<.001
5 Affect and Risk (Rottenstreich & Hsee, 2001) p=0.77
6 Priming consumerism (Bauer et al., 2012) p=0.15
7 Correspondence Bias (Miyamoto & Kitayama, 2002) p<.001
8 Disgust & Homophobia (Inbar et al., 2009) p=0.56
9 Incidental Anchors (Critcher & Gilovich, 2008) p=0.25
10 Social Value Orientation (Van Lange et al., 1997) p<.001
11 Trolley Dilemma 1 (Hauser et al., 2007) p<.001
12 SMS & Well-Being (Anderson et al., 2012) p=0.58
13 False Consensus 1 (Ross et al., 1977) p=0.23
14 False Consensus 2 (Ross et al., 1977) p<.001
15 Position & Power (Giessner & Schubert, 2007) p=0.31
16 Framing (Tversky & Kahneman, 1981) p=0.43
17 Trolley Dilemma 2 (Hauser et al., 2007) p=0.42
18 Tempting Fate (Risen & Gilovich, 2008) p=0.01
19 Actions are Choices (Savani et al. 2010) p<.001
20 Intuitive Reasoning (Norenzayan et al. 2002) p<.001
21 Less is Better (Hsee, 1998) p<.001
22 Moral Typecasting (Gray & Wegner, 2009) p<.001
23 Moral Cleansing (Zhong & Liljenquist, 2006) p=0.08
24 Assimilation and Contrast (Schwarz et al., 1991) p=0.39
25 Choosing or Rejecting (Shafir, 1993) p=0.10
26 Priming warmth (Zaval et al., 2014) p=0.01
27 Intentional Side Effects (Knobe, 2003) p<.001
28 Direction and Similarity (Tversky & Gati, 1978) p=0.99
- andrelaszlo 8y agoLet me know if I messed anything up and I'll fix it, it was a quick copy-paste.
- jonnycomputer 8y agowhich journals would be nice. quick way of getting idea of how important these papers actually were.
- sys_64738 8y agoNone of the classics.
- conjectures 8y agoI'm not much of a psychologist, but I can see at least one paper by Khaneman, who won the economics Nobel for that sort of stuff. So not sure if you're being sarcastic or not?
- tropo 8y agoNobody wants to touch some of the classics, at least in the USA. Like this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_of_despair https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_of_despair Scientifically, it might be of value to replicate the experiments, but I really can't imagine anybody attempting them.
- your-nanny 8y agoit's almost as if they are avoiding all the experiments that have been replicated so often the result barely bears mention in the papers using them in favor of random crap from the field.