I experienced it exactly as you describe. To me this argument always came across as fabricated and empty. I have seen too many examples internally at that pla

I experienced it exactly as you describe. To me this argument always came across as fabricated and empty. I have seen too many examples internally at that place, where the (to me) obvious moral choice was neglected or even laughed at. The "because of us, instruments are priced properly everywhere and that's good for everyone" is interesting. Does that result solely exist because of us making a market? What is 'properly priced' exactly and why would it be a Bad Thing if it were less 'properly priced'? And why is this even a goal that should be pursued? And should that goal be pursued at all (and I do mean ALL) cost? Those questions were never answered to my satisfaction.