4 ms·
This seems wrong on its face: it conflates intelligence and consciousness (hence the various premises about brains being computable). You don't need a machine t
by henryaj 8y ago
This seems wrong on its face: it conflates intelligence and consciousness (hence the various premises about brains being computable). You don't need a machine to be conscious for it to be intelligent, or superintelligent.
- chobeat 8y agoBoth your argument and the argument that you're criticizing make assumptions on what intelligence is and what are the properties that define human-level intelligence. How can you know that consciousness is not a prerequisite for human-level intelligence if you cannot define human-level intelligence?