3 ms·
The article doesn't seem to say much beyond the heading. How do you reconcile being anti positive discrimination, wanting more women in various fields, not hav
by have_faith 8y ago
The article doesn't seem to say much beyond the heading.
How do you reconcile being anti positive discrimination, wanting more women in various fields, not having a goal as to what number is enough and not understanding when any of the various sides involved will be happy with the result.
Will the author be happy if women are only promoted because of their talents but an imbalance is achieved as a result?
- mjevans 8y agoSeek out the negative aspects of a given thing as a profession, as well as the positive ones. Make the profession desirably by decreasing the bad and increasing the good; for everyone, fairly.
- lupinglade 8y agoExactly. The current approach seems so backwards. Yes, don’t discriminate in either direction - choose based on real value, based on skill, experience or potential. This inverse descriminarion is just as bad, if not worse. It may be necessary for a temporary rebalance, but after that it needs to go away. Just like all the skin color Emoji, what in the world? All they do is promote racism and highlight skin color as a key difference. Why aren’t there Emoji for different eye color , hair color and all combinations? A blended color is far better.