> It's a little early to say it contains nothing we cannot simulate. Suggesting that AIs have to look or behave like human brains in order to have human level

> It's a little early to say it contains nothing we cannot simulate. Suggesting that AIs have to look or behave like human brains in order to have human level intelligence is like suggesting that airplanes must flap their wings in order to fly. It seems far more plausible to me that any AI we build will be as alien to our way of thinking as a F-15 Eagle is to a bald eagle. Given that, I think it's important that we think about how we communicate with this AI, and how we ensure that it follows what we command it to do, rather than going off in its own direction, with negative consequences for human civilization. I think that the negative consequences of current AI should be warning enough that we need to worry about future, more capable AI.