>It's very rare for new rules to apply retroactively — why is this surprising? Surely you would only be applying rules retroactively if you were engaged in reo

>It's very rare for new rules to apply retroactively — why is this surprising? Surely you would only be applying rules retroactively if you were engaged in reopening finished arbitration? Cancelling a current process that is still in open session, on the basis that you have already publicly agreed that employees being forced into that process is unfair, is not being retrospective.