5 ms·
Not sure I understand your concern: It’s standard boilerplate for the case where private data is required to run an analysis, but is not otherwise used. Not sa
by klmr 8y ago
Not sure I understand your concern: It’s standard boilerplate for the case where private data is required to run an analysis, but is not otherwise used.
Not saying that it should necessarily be trusted but the wording isn’t problematic. What is problematic is the complete lack of legal security.
- ajiang 8y agoDefinitely not boilerplate. The privacy policy is quite light, doesn't define terms like "external parties", doesn't even have the company's name or origin.
- klmr 8y agoI was talking specifically in the context of OP’s comment. I otherwise agree with you. But the wording that OP seems to complain about simply means that, in order to perform the requested analysis, the company needs to temporarily store your data.
- Beefin 8y agoI don't see any other way to do it haha
- Beefin 8y agoYeah I mean Im a one man shop, have no lawyer. The privacy policy is this: we don't store your genome or any identifying information beyond the report which is automatically deleted (or deleted at your request) within 48 hours. Is there anything else you want to know?