3 ms·
cool. seems very ambiguous and watered down. without intent seems like it should just be called "watching" or "recording". also does it stop being called "So
by fearai 8y ago
cool. seems very ambiguous and watered down.
without intent seems like it should just be called "watching" or "recording". also does it stop being called "Sousveillance" if done on a plane? or hiking above a certain altitude?
we are very interested in pulling data from "accidental" surveillance.
- type0 8y ago> it should just be called "watching" or "recording". also does it stop being called "Sousveillance" if done on a plane? or hiking above a certain altitude? or if it's done with a drone it's almost terrorism as many politicians would like you to believe. The concept of sousveilance can never be implemented in any meaningful democratic way on a day to day life because individuals are always subordinate to the state.