3 ms·
Again, I am not sure what race has to do with this at all. The CEO happens to be black and had a negative interaction with someone on Charter’s board. Oh well.
by 0x8BADF00D 8y ago
Again, I am not sure what race has to do with this at all. The CEO happens to be black and had a negative interaction with someone on Charter’s board. Oh well. There are many other cable companies and networks out there. That’s why there is something missing from this story. Why would this guy care so much that he was being barred? It’s like the gay wedding cake thing. The plaintiffs specifically found a baker who had strong religious beliefs.
- dragonwriter 8y ago> Again, I am not sure what race has to do with this at all That's literally the entire point of a trial and presentation of evidence. The Charter/Comcast argument was “it doesn't matter if we were actually discriminating on the basis of race, because the First Amendment allows us to do so, so there's no need for a trial to determine if that's what we were doing (which we weren't.)” This decision simply says: “The First Amendment doesn't allow you to discriminate by race in the way alleged, so the question of whether you did or did not actually will need to be resolved in court.”