2 ms·
The evidence is weak because this is a motion to dismiss. My understanding (IANAL) is that the bar for dismissal would be that there isn't even a valid allegati
by daveFNbuck 8y ago
The evidence is weak because this is a motion to dismiss. My understanding (IANAL) is that the bar for dismissal would be that there isn't even a valid allegation. It would be very difficult to have strong evidence that a company discriminated against you at this point.
Once there's an actual trial, both parties get to gather evidence via discovery and they'll get to review internal documents about why these decisions were made.
- jhall1468 8y agoSo much this. It's actually kind of mind-boggling how many people think you need a mountain of evidence to make any legal claim when the reverse is largely true (you made a decision, we think it was done in violation of the Constitution and through discovery want to see if that's the case).