3 ms·
do you have a counter argument for: "you still need to trust the devices that write to the blockchain" -- so ultimately you would be trusting the supplier.
by nsomaru 8y ago
do you have a counter argument for: "you still need to trust the devices that write to the blockchain" -- so ultimately you would be trusting the supplier.
- bhaak 8y agoBut that is much less of a problem than other similar constraints. You can use any computer, wipe it and use something like Tails to access the blockchain. There is not a centralized supplier of blockchain manipulation devices.
- hanniabu 8y agoIn order to write to chain you need a key. If malicious activity is found, these keys can be banned from the network along with any products that they verify. It's not that the system can't be exploited, it's introducing incentives to make it economically unviable to do so.