4 ms·
I like to think it's because of this article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0321-8 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0321-8
by jackjackk0 8y ago
I like to think it's because of this article:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0321-8 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0321-8
- SNACKeR99 8y agoNothing has soured me more on bitcoin than its impact on the environment. If for no other reason than that, I'm done with it.
- gl00pp 8y agoI mean I hear ya but it seems a little bias when they are 'projecting'. I mean, if I had 0 wives last week, got married this week, does that mean in 2 months i'll have 8 wives? (no i am not in UT) "Here we show that projected Bitcoin usage, should it follow the rate of adoption of other broadly adopted technologies"
- asdff 8y agoEven today bitcoin is a serious energy concern. Currently the network uses as much energy as Denmark, while commanding a 0.033% share of cashless transactions. Which countries will bitcoin surpass in energy usage in 2019 as mining gets exponentially more difficult by design?