3 ms·
problem with the $8/mo-type services is that you're limited as to what sort of tech you can use
by spiralhead 19y ago
problem with the $8/mo-type services is that you're limited as to what sort of tech you can use
- sabat 19y agoTrue, although some providers are more liberal than others. Dreamhost lets you run your own stuff, like ruby, php, rails, etc. But yeah, it's a limited environment, and you're sharing. When you're first starting out, you may not care about that. But eventually ...
- dpapathanasiou 19y agoThe other big downside is that you can't just go in and kill an errant process if your alpha version does something weird. And you're also in the dark about what those other processes (those not owned by you) might be doing at any given time. Controlling the entire server as root is just better.
- jaggederest 19y agowell, to be honest, you get a shell account. I'm hosting stuff on dreamhost, and it's entirely possible to killall my-errant-script when you need to. Just realize that you're a pretty low-priveledge user. It's a great deal for static file hosting though, if you're a data intensive site as opposed to CPU-intensive site (or even a data-intensive site in addition to cpu-intensive)
- scaz 19y agoIf you use FastCGI/Rails with Dreamhost, as soon as you get any traffic they will shut down your account for "Excessive CPU Usage". I've seen it happen to a lot of sites hosted there that are linked from Reddit/Digg.