6 ms·
> Because paying is the problem, and expecting that prospective employers would pay for your expenses for a test that is used to infer basic competences is at b
by wolfgke 8y ago
> Because paying is the problem, and expecting that prospective employers would pay for your expenses for a test that is used to infer basic competences is at best wishful thinking.
I am cautious with this kind of statement, since this saves the respective company time to check these competencies by itself, which is a pecuniary advantage for the company (since it can obiously use this time to earn money).
- johan_larson 8y agoI imagine a 2-3 hour test that costs something like $200, which seems like a reasonable investment, if many or most employers are looking for it. For the companies, it would save an hour or two of interviewing. If they accepted the test as indicative of basic coding sanity, they could then focus their interviews on more general or domain-related skills.
- geezerjay 8y ago> I imagine a 2-3 hour test that costs something like $200, which seems like a reasonable investment Nowadays you get the same result or even a better one by spending zero to do the prospective employer's test. It is not an investment nor it is reasonable. Companies already dump preliminary screening on specialized HR companies.