> housing costs could be flat or even decrease if we simply increased supply dramatically I have a feeling places like SF and NY have already tried this. Consi

> housing costs could be flat or even decrease if we simply increased supply dramatically I have a feeling places like SF and NY have already tried this. Considering most of these foreign investors are most interested in these two cities over lets say Nebraska, it's hard to see how NY just needs to "build more supply" is a solution. > If we had policies that encouraged always building We have those in Australia, it's called negative gearing. We also have the most expensive houses when compared to average income and our cities have taken your advice and started to build up at rapid paces. Still hasn't worked. The Aus government is now suggesting we lower our immigration cap from 1% of total pop yearly so maybe that will help.