3 ms·
Yes! Or black should resign. And in addition, they have clocks for a reason - though time is added indefinitely at the end (if a player moves fast enough) - if
by russellbeattie 8y ago
Yes! Or black should resign. And in addition, they have clocks for a reason - though time is added indefinitely at the end (if a player moves fast enough) - if a player takes an hour more than an opponent (like Carlsen did in the middle of game 8) they should start to feel the pressure of that more severely.
- umanwizard 8y agoWhy do you think Black should lose here? Why is Black's position worse than White's ? If your answer is "White has more material", keep in mind that chess is not about material; it is about checkmate. But, nevertheless, here's an example with equal material where checkmate is possible for both sides, but not without blunders. Who should have to resign here? http://www.jinchess.com/chessboard/?p=--------------------k-------p-------P-------K------------------- http://www.jinchess.com/chessboard/?p=--------------------k-... If you really insist on saying "well yes, they should have to keep moving the kings around aimlessly for hours until somebody's clock runs out", you're proposing a game that is so fundamentally unlike chess that it should probably be given a different name.