Hmm. This implies there is accountability on the CEO's part that is imposed at a level below state judicial action. This obviously isn't true for founder-chairm

Hmm. This implies there is accountability on the CEO's part that is imposed at a level below state judicial action. This obviously isn't true for founder-chairman-CEO dictator like Zuck. In these cases, is there an accepted and agreed-upon standard of behavior for such a dictator in these cases? Because this looks a lot like uncharted territory which makes the journalist's claim look like mere grandstanding.