4 ms·

It's fascinating to see the differences in language around statistics across disciplines. I used to work in a group where my colleagues came from different back

It's fascinating to see the differences in language around statistics across disciplines. I used to work in a group where my colleagues came from different backgrounds (one had a phd in particle physics, another a phd in stats, and the third a phd in economics). We all were hired around the same time. We spent the first month learning how to communicate with each other about basic statistical concepts so that we were on the same page.

otoburb 8y ago
I wonder if the economics PhD had the most difficulty due to graph axis inversion[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2009_January_24#why_does_my_economics_book_put_the_price_as_a_Y_axis_when_the_quantity_is_a_function_of_it.3F https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archi...
- dhairya 8y ago
  That didn't really come up. We were doing institutional research for a university to support senior leaders. Most of our work entailed working with transactional HR data, educational outcomes data, other information collected at the university to provide policy analysis and strategic recommendations. The stats and econ phd came from the same school, so they had more shared vocabulary, but definitely thought about problems differently. The physics colleague came from Europe and also thought about problems at a much different scale. So a lot of the initial time was spent deriving proofs so that everyone felt comfortable with different statistical methods used for analysis. The data we worked with was often small scale, sparse, and not really IID. The proofs all essentially converged, but it was interesting because different language and assumptions were made depending on their distinct disciplinary backgrounds. Sorry for the vague speak. A lot of the work we did was confidential, so can't really talk specifics.

otoburb 8y ago

I wonder if the economics PhD had the most difficulty due to graph axis inversion[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2009_January_24#why_does_my_economics_book_put_the_price_as_a_Y_axis_when_the_quantity_is_a_function_of_it.3F https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archi...

dhairya 8y ago
That didn't really come up. We were doing institutional research for a university to support senior leaders. Most of our work entailed working with transactional HR data, educational outcomes data, other information collected at the university to provide policy analysis and strategic recommendations. The stats and econ phd came from the same school, so they had more shared vocabulary, but definitely thought about problems differently. The physics colleague came from Europe and also thought about problems at a much different scale. So a lot of the initial time was spent deriving proofs so that everyone felt comfortable with different statistical methods used for analysis. The data we worked with was often small scale, sparse, and not really IID. The proofs all essentially converged, but it was interesting because different language and assumptions were made depending on their distinct disciplinary backgrounds. Sorry for the vague speak. A lot of the work we did was confidential, so can't really talk specifics.