There isn't really any claim in the article as far as I can tell. There is just a whole lot of smoke and mirrors in the form of definitions, charts and bait and

There isn't really any claim in the article as far as I can tell. There is just a whole lot of smoke and mirrors in the form of definitions, charts and bait and switch. Near the end of the article the author poses the question > Does anyone really believe that Vicodin is killing more Americans than fentanyl and carfentanil? I sure don't. With all the data being shown, you would expect that he could actually make more of a claim than a belief based one. It is a really confused article that seems to have no other purpose than to try to create confusion around statistics. The author would have you believe that elephants don't exist because one source is describing the trunk, another is describing the leg and a third is describing the tail.