>I'm not sure what you mean here. ast-macros can still wrap ast-macros. Yes, although sometimes text macros are useful, but ast-macros are generally much bette

>I'm not sure what you mean here. ast-macros can still wrap ast-macros. Yes, although sometimes text macros are useful, but ast-macros are generally much better yes. >In the same way that I talk about cognitive overhead above, the requirement that a user manually pass around compile time information is dumb. If the macro facility is sufficient, it would be implemented by the use of a macro; you do not need to then manually write it during each time. In C, you can use sizeof. Also sometimes you want to pass the array with a smaller length than its actual length (possibly at an offset, too).