3 ms·
> Not even sure how it would work or even make any sense to have N:M handled by the kernel. N:M is usually a mainly a userspace thing. Correct, I meant that th
by 0x8BADF00D 8y ago
> Not even sure how it would work or even make any sense to have N:M handled by the kernel. N:M is usually a mainly a userspace thing.
Correct, I meant that the benchmarking program itself probably used that implementation. Not the Win NT kernel’s implementation of OS threads.