> I've had pretty bad experiences with btrfs in the distant past. Around a decade ago I had all my company laptops using btrfs and it worked great, as long as w

> I've had pretty bad experiences with btrfs in the distant past. Around a decade ago I had all my company laptops using btrfs and it worked great, as long as we didn't get >80% usage or something. It worked well for around a year. But then the reliability of btrfs dropped, and we had repeated data loss and switched back to ext. btrfs wasn't considered stable until 2012. Using an experimental filesystem for all your company laptops seems to be asking for trouble.