2 ms·
ok i'll bite ... the y axis starts at 2.6, not 0, which visually exaggerates the differences. regardless of the merits of this analysis, this graph is disingen
by pgbovine 16y ago
ok i'll bite ... the y axis starts at 2.6, not 0, which visually exaggerates the differences. regardless of the merits of this analysis, this graph is disingenuous
- nkassis 16y agonot all graph should start at 0. In this case that might be a good idea but if your data is all above 5000 and moves a couple points, you probably don't want to show 0 because it will be hard to see what is happening. A one point change might be very significant.
- maukdaddy 16y agonot 0, which visually exaggerates the differences This is one of the most overused, and INCORRECT, memes on HN. You don't include 0 on a graph where data doesn't naturally include 0!