Effects like that could only be measured if they repeated the same survey many times over decades before publishing. Even then it would be confounded by a lot o

Effects like that could only be measured if they repeated the same survey many times over decades before publishing. Even then it would be confounded by a lot of other factors. Instead they’ve marched forward using junk science to discredit science. I found it a really weird and off key article. They might be right but I wouldn’t use this article to demonstrate it. (And I otherwise have a lot of respect for the authors.)