3 ms·
One might suspect that SC was a bit more savvy in how it presented its case to the world. Britain, a major trading party for the southern states (and having bee
by mannykannot 8y ago
One might suspect that SC was a bit more savvy in how it presented its case to the world. Britain, a major trading party for the southern states (and having been as guilty as the US in establishing and profiting from slavery in the Americas, and was still profiting indirectly), had by then abolished slavery in its own colonies, and was divided in its attitude to the Confederacy.
Regardless of what considerations went into that particular declaration, it is clearly a minority position and so should not be given greater weight than the majority.
- brightball 8y agoI don’t think it’s a matter of weight so much as people just having different priorities. There were only 4 declarations of causes despite 11 states secession. 4 of them seceded specifically in response to being requisitioned for troops without congressional approval. Virginia’s articles even went so far as to say they would rejoin.