3 ms·
So maybe it should be more like the UL model? Let the insurance companies fund the proof of safety/efficacy, but it's not mandatory.
by panzagl 8y ago
So maybe it should be more like the UL model? Let the insurance companies fund the proof of safety/efficacy, but it's not mandatory.
- howard941 8y agoIf by UL you mean Underwriters Laboratories in the US or the other US NRTLs, compliance testing costs are borne by manufacturers, not insurance companies.