4 ms·
It seems like you've already made up your mind, so not sure why I'm bothering, but... >Most grain is grown no-till I don't think this is accurate for wheat.
by cwkoss 8y ago
It seems like you've already made up your mind, so not sure why I'm bothering, but...
>Most grain is grown no-till
I don't think this is accurate for wheat.
> food produced to grow normal wheat than any of the perennial grains they have come up with so far
A brand new innovation is less efficient that an existing tech that has existed for centuries? Crazy.
> But we solved that problem decades ago
We've solved soil destruction? What?
- agsdfgsd 8y ago>I don't think this is accurate for wheat. Why are you making claims if you don't know anything about the subject of discussion? >A brand new innovation is less efficient that an existing tech that has existed for centuries? What are you talking about? It is not tech, it is plants. You can't argue we need a perennial grain because it is more efficient, and then say its ok for it to be less efficient because it is new. >We've solved soil destruction? Yes. This is not 1934, no-till has been the norm for decades. If your ideas about modern farming are 100 years old, you might want to stop telling modern farmers what problems they have.