3 ms·
Reads like a personal vendetta. It's basically throwing shade at someone with no backing at all, openly referring to overheard stories and people wishing ill on
by AYBABTME 8y ago
Reads like a personal vendetta. It's basically throwing shade at someone with no backing at all, openly referring to overheard stories and people wishing ill on someone else.
If you find-and-replace "Sheryl Sandberg" with any other name, the article just reads like a vile piece.
- billfruit 8y agoBut many such pieces float around in the media with Zuckerberg's name. Sandburg is very vested in FBs actions and policies, however most media coverage on her treated her as 'saint' compared with the distrust showered on Zuckerberg by the same media. Perhaps, I do feel they feel Sandburg comes across to them as a normative person, while Z often acts and speaks like someone on the Spectrum.