> Frankly, that's an entirely appropriate way to deal with security. No, it’s not. You don’t have to be perfect, but “critical vulnerabilities and half the own

> Frankly, that's an entirely appropriate way to deal with security. No, it’s not. You don’t have to be perfect, but “critical vulnerabilities and half the owners don’t care” sounds a long way from approaching perfect. This is why we have botnets made of webcams and blogs, and constant leaks of people’s private information and passwords.